Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLUMBAR ARTHROPLASTY
Open Access

Is Degenerative Spondylolisthesis a Contraindication for Total Disc Replacement? Kineflex Lumbar Disc Replacement in 7 Patients With 24-Month Follow-up

Ulrich R. Hähnle, Karen Sliwa, Malan de Villiers, Ian R. Weinberg, Barry M.B.E. Sweet and Geoffrey P. Candy
International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2008, 2 (2) 92-100; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2007-0125-NT
Ulrich R. Hähnle
aUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
bLinkfield Park Clinic, Johannesburg, South Africa
MD, FCS (Ortho)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Sliwa
aUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Malan de Villiers
cUniversity of Potchefstroom, South Africa
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian R. Weinberg
bLinkfield Park Clinic, Johannesburg, South Africa
MD, FCS (Neuro)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry M.B.E. Sweet
aUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geoffrey P. Candy
aUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Insertion Technique

    Position A: Spondylolisthetic disc space before operation. Position B: Initial engagement of the prosthesis into the disc space after full nucleotomy, disc space mobilization, and cutting of the insertion grooves. The further insertion is performed with a fully freed prosthetic mechanism. Position C: Advancement of the prosthesis into the disc space, until almost flush with the posterior wall of the cephalad vertebral body. The prosthetic endplates are individually advanced, alternating between top and bottom prosthetic endplate. Position D: Further advancement of the bottom prosthetic endplate, until almost flush with the posterior wall of the caudad; full reduction of the spondylolisthesis. During this advancement the inferior endplate pivots around the articulating mechanism of the prosthesis, reducing the pressure between the leading edge of the inferior prosthetic endplate and the bony endplate. Position E: Securing of the final reduced position by placement of a screw into the into the insertion groove of the inferior vertebra. This counteracts the displacing forces (For more information on insertion technique, see Hähnle et al.13)

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Lumbar Disc Replacement in DSPL Measurements

    Lumbar disc in DSPL-measured parameters. Pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS); pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (cephalad endplate L1–cephalad endplate S1) (LL)

  • Figures 3A and 3B
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figures 3A and 3B

    43-year-old active lady with severe LBP and SS symptoms. Posterolateral fusion L4-S1 4 years before.

  • Figures 3C and 3D
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figures 3C and 3D

    Myelogram confirms severe SS

  • Figures 3E and 3F
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figures 3E and 3F

    CT Myelogram shows severe facet arthrosis.

  • Figures 3G, 3H, 3I, 3J, and 3K
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figures 3G, 3H, 3I, 3J, and 3K

    2-year follow-up: good clinical (ODI = 22, VAS = 2) and radiological outcome.

  • Figures 4A, 4B, and 4C
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figures 4A, 4B, and 4C

    62-year-old patient with severe mechanical LBP and right-side leg pain for 2 years.

  • Figures 4D and 4E
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figures 4D and 4E

    MRI scanning shows partial reduction of listhesis in lying position, significant L4-L5 facet degeneration and DDD.

  • Figure 4F
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4F

    Intraoperative radiograph shows good alignment and listhesis reduction.

  • Figures 4G and 4H
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figures 4G and 4H

    (G) Partial extrusion of inferior prosthetic endplate at 2 days. (H) Further extrusion of inferior prosthetic endplate at 6 days.

  • Figures 4I, 4J, 4K, and 4L
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figures 4I, 4J, 4K, and 4L

    2 years after reoperation to reposition inferior endplate: excellent clinical (ODI = 0; VAS = 0) and radiological outcomes.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 2, Issue 2
1 Jan 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is Degenerative Spondylolisthesis a Contraindication for Total Disc Replacement? Kineflex Lumbar Disc Replacement in 7 Patients With 24-Month Follow-up
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Is Degenerative Spondylolisthesis a Contraindication for Total Disc Replacement? Kineflex Lumbar Disc Replacement in 7 Patients With 24-Month Follow-up
Ulrich R. Hähnle, Karen Sliwa, Malan de Villiers, Ian R. Weinberg, Barry M.B.E. Sweet, Geoffrey P. Candy
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2008, 2 (2) 92-100; DOI: 10.1016/SASJ-2007-0125-NT

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Is Degenerative Spondylolisthesis a Contraindication for Total Disc Replacement? Kineflex Lumbar Disc Replacement in 7 Patients With 24-Month Follow-up
Ulrich R. Hähnle, Karen Sliwa, Malan de Villiers, Ian R. Weinberg, Barry M.B.E. Sweet, Geoffrey P. Candy
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jan 2008, 2 (2) 92-100; DOI: 10.1016/SASJ-2007-0125-NT
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIAL AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgement
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons
  • Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
  • Clinical performance of an elastomeric lumbar disc replacement: Minimum 12 months follow-up
Show more Lumbar arthroplasty

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • spondylolisthesis
  • total disc replacement
  • radiological outcome
  • clinical outcome

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire