Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLumbar Spine

Biplanar Expandable Cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Are Safe and Achieve Good 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in an Asian Population

David Shaoen Sim, Ayyadarshan Kasivishvanaath, Lei Jiang, Reuben Chee Cheong Soh and Zhixing Marcus Ling
International Journal of Spine Surgery August 2023, 17 (4) 520-525; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8472
David Shaoen Sim
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
MBCHB
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: davidsimshaoen@gmail.com
Ayyadarshan Kasivishvanaath
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lei Jiang
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
FRCS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reuben Chee Cheong Soh
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
FRCS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhixing Marcus Ling
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
FRCS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Intraoperative fluoroscopy of trial implants, anterior-posterior and lateral view.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Outer polyetheretherketone shell, seen from the top and side.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Inner titanium shim, seen from the top and side.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Outer polyetheretherketone (PEEK) shell and inner titanium shim loaded in-line onto inserter instrument, seen from the side (direction of advancement of inner titanium shim into outer PEEK shell as demonstrated by the black arrow).

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Intraoperative fluoroscopic confirmation of satisfactory cage position before expansion, anterior-posterior and lateral view.

  • Figure 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6

    Biplanar expansion in medial-lateral direction and cranial-caudal direction achieved with advancement of inner titanium shim into outer polyetheretherketone shell, seen from the top and side.

  • Figure 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7

    Biplanar expansion of the cage was achieved via advancing the inner titanium shim into the outer polyetheretherketone shell as visualized on lateral intraoperative fluoroscopy.

  • Figure 8
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8

    Final position of expanded cage with pedicle screws and rods inserted, anterior-posterior and lateral view.

  • Figure 9
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9

    Preoperative and postoperative radiographs of open 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed on a 74-y-old patient who presented with neurogenic claudication.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Patient demographics, surgical approach, and surgery levels (N = 23).

    Variable n (%)
    Age, y, mean (SD)65.5 ± 9.0
    Body mass index, mean (SD)25.5 ± 3.6
    Gender
     Male8 (35%)
     Female15 (65%)
    Approach
     Open19 (83%)
     MIS4 (17%)
    Levels
     17 (30%)
     212 (52%)
     34 (17%)
    Spinal levels fused43
    • Note: Data presented as n (%) unless otherwise noted.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Clinical and radiological outcomes.

    Biplanar Expandable Cage (n = 23)PreoperativePostoperativea Difference P ValueAchieved Minimum Clinically Important Difference (%)
    Patient-reported outcome scores
     VAS back pain6.5 ± 2.61.7 ± 2.2−4.8 ± 3.4<.00191%
     VAS lower limb pain5.7 ± 3.40.5 ± 1.6−5.2 ± 3.8<.00194%
     Oswestry Disability Index49.4 ± 15.120.4 ± 14.2−29.0 ± 18.1<.00187%
     Neurogenic symptom score53.3 ± 21.116.5 ± 19.8−36.8 ± 22.1<.00196%
    Radiological outcomes
     Segmental lordosis, °7.2 ± 3.910.0 ± 3.32.8 ± 2.2<.001-
     Lumbar lordosis, °36.5 ± 14.842.6 ± 12.16.1 ± 7.2<.001-
     Anterior disc height, mm8.8 ± 2.712.0 ± 2.43.2 ± 2.0<.001-
     Posterior disc height, mm5.3 ± 1.57.4 ± 1.52.1 ± 1.5<.001-
     Foraminal height, mm12.1 ± 2.613.8 ± 2.91.7 ± 1.7<.001-
    • Abbreviation: VAS, visual analog scale.

    • Note: Data presented as mean ± SD.

    • ↵a Mean follow-up duration (y)—1.25 ± 0.26 (range, 0.94–1.79).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 17, Issue 4
1 Aug 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Biplanar Expandable Cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Are Safe and Achieve Good 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in an Asian Population
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Biplanar Expandable Cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Are Safe and Achieve Good 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in an Asian Population
David Shaoen Sim, Ayyadarshan Kasivishvanaath, Lei Jiang, Reuben Chee Cheong Soh, Zhixing Marcus Ling
International Journal of Spine Surgery Aug 2023, 17 (4) 520-525; DOI: 10.14444/8472

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Biplanar Expandable Cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Are Safe and Achieve Good 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in an Asian Population
David Shaoen Sim, Ayyadarshan Kasivishvanaath, Lei Jiang, Reuben Chee Cheong Soh, Zhixing Marcus Ling
International Journal of Spine Surgery Aug 2023, 17 (4) 520-525; DOI: 10.14444/8472
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Stand-Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, 360° Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Arthroplasty for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Focus on Nerve Decompression and Painful Spinal Instability Resolution
  • Recovery Trajectories After Lumbar Fusion Stratified by Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Disability Levels
  • Association Between Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Use and Surgical Outcomes Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Medical Claims Database Analysis
Show more Lumbar Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • biplanar expandable cages
  • transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
  • lumber degenerative disc disease
  • spinal stenosis

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire