Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleMinimally Invasive Surgery

Validation of Veterans RAND 12-Item Physical Function Survey in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Michael T. Nolte, James M. Parrish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Caroline N. Jadczak, Shruthi Mohan, Cara E. Geoghegan, Nadia M. Hrynewycz and Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery June 2022, 8308; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8308
Michael T. Nolte
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James M. Parrish
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathaniel W. Jenkins
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elliot D.K. Cha
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Conor P. Lynch
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline N. Jadczak
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shruthi Mohan
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cara E. Geoghegan
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nadia M. Hrynewycz
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kern Singh
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Correlation of Veterans RAND 12-item physical component score (VR-12 PCS) with patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function (PROMIS-PF) and 12-item Short Form physical component score (SF-12 PCS) at the preoperative timepoint.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Correlation of Veterans RAND 12-item physical component score (VR-12 PCS) with patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function (PROMIS-PF) and 12-item Short Form physical component score (SF-12 PCS) at the 6-wk postoperative timepoint.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Correlation of Veterans RAND 12-item physical component score (VR-12 PCS) with patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function (PROMIS-PF) and 12-item Short Form physical component score (SF-12 PCS) at the 12-wk postoperative timepoint.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Correlation of Veterans RAND 12-item physical component score (VR-12 PCS) with patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function (PROMIS-PF) and 12-item Short Form physical component score (SF-12 PCS) at the 6-mo postoperative timepoint.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Correlation of Veterans RAND 12-item physical component score (VR-12 PCS) with patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function (PROMIS-PF) and 12-item Short Form physical component score (SF-12 PCS) at the 1-y postoperative timepoint.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Baseline characteristics of study population.

    CharacteristicsTotal %, (n)
    Age, y, mean ± SD53.8 ± 9.7
    Gender, % (n)
     Female44.1% (26)
     Male55.9% (33)
    Smoking status, % (n)
     Nonsmoker91.5% (54)
     Smoker8.5% (5)
    Body mass index, % (n)
     <30 kg/m2—nonobese47.5% (28)
     ≥30 kg/m2—obese52.5% (31)
    Charlson Comorbidity Index, mean ± SD1.8 ± 1.4
    Spinal pathology, % (n)
     Degenerative spondylolisthesis63.3% (31)
     Isthmic spondylolisthesis20.4% (10)
     Retrolisthesis3.4% (2)
     Lateral listhesis1.7% (1)
     Herniated nucleus pulposus15.3% (9)
     Degenerative disc disease45.8% (27)
     Stenosis88.1% (52)
     Foraminal stenosis50.9% (30)
    Perioperative characteristics, mean ± SD
     Operative time, min)121.1 ± 20.4
     Estimated blood loss, mL)56.2 ± 61.8
     Hospital length of stay, h)34.8 ± 17.5
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Postoperative changes in physical function scores.

    Patient-Reported Outcome Measure n Score,Mean ± SDChange,Mean ± SD P Valuea
    12-Item Veterans RAND PCS   
     Preoperative5932.3 ± 9.1  
     6 wk5933.8 ± 9.81.6 ± 9.50.210
     12 wk5937.7 ± 11.25.5 ± 8.5 <0.001
     6 mo5941.3 ± 12.29.1 ± 10.6 <0.001
     1 y5942.2 ± 12.89.9 ± 11.1 <0.001
    12-Item Short Form PCS   
     Preoperative5930.9 ± 8.0  
     6 wk5931.5 ± 8.80.6 ± 8.90.594
     12 wk5835.6 ± 10.44.8 ± 8.7 <0.001
     6 mo5938.5 ± 12.37.6 ± 10.6 <0.001
     1 y5939.9 ± 12.59.1 ± 11.1 <0.001
    PROMIS-PF   
     Preoperative5934.5 ± 6.1  
     6 wk5435.9 ± 7.21.6 ± 7.20.115
     12 wk5340.7 ± 7.55.9 ± 7.3 <0.001
     6 mo5243.3 ± 8.18.9 ± 8.5 <0.001
     1 y5044.7 ± 10.19.5 ± 8.6 <0.001
    • Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance.

    • aP value calculated using paired t test comparing scores at each timepoint to preoperative values.

    • PCS, physical component score; PROMIS-PF, patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Association of VR-12 with SF-12 and PROMIS-PF following minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

    Patient-Reported Outcome MeasurePearson, r P Valuea Partial, r P Valuea
    VR-12 vs SF-12
     Preoperative0.917 <0.001 0.913 <0.001
     6 wk0.964 <0.001 0.963 <0.001
     12 wk0.973 <0.001 0.973 <0.001
     6 mo0.965 <0.001 0.960 <0.001
     1 y0.973 <0.001 0.972 <0.001
    VR-12 vs PROMIS-PF
     Preoperative0.583 <0.001 0.572 <0.001
     6 wk0.727 <0.001 0.710 <0.001
     12 wk0.793 <0.001 0.792 <0.001
     6 mo0.832 <0.001 0.823 <0.001
     1 y0.845 <0.001 0.844 <0.001
    • Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance.

    • aP value signifes significant correlation.

    • PROMIS-PF, patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function; SF-12, Short Form 12-Item Survey; VR-12, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey.

Next
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Validation of Veterans RAND 12-Item Physical Function Survey in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Validation of Veterans RAND 12-Item Physical Function Survey in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Michael T. Nolte, James M. Parrish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Caroline N. Jadczak, Shruthi Mohan, Cara E. Geoghegan, Nadia M. Hrynewycz, Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jun 2022, 8308; DOI: 10.14444/8308

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Validation of Veterans RAND 12-Item Physical Function Survey in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Michael T. Nolte, James M. Parrish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Caroline N. Jadczak, Shruthi Mohan, Cara E. Geoghegan, Nadia M. Hrynewycz, Kern Singh
International Journal of Spine Surgery Jun 2022, 8308; DOI: 10.14444/8308
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications
  • A Spine Surgeon’s Learning Curve With the Minimally Invasive L5 to S1 Lateral ALIF Surgical Approach: Perioperative Outcomes and Technical Considerations
  • Fully Navigated Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Detailed Technical Report and Description of 15 Cases
Show more Minimally Invasive Surgery

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • lumbar surgery
  • patient-reported outcomes
  • minimally invasive
  • low back pain
  • outcomes
  • Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
  • radiculopathy
  • Stenosis
  • disability
  • survey
  • questionnaire

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire