Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1
Loosening of sacroiliac joint instrumentation with gross halo and no evidence of bridging bone through the sacroiliac joint.
- Figure 3
Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion with author’s described technique (left SIJ). Right SIJ shows pseudarthrosis without instrumentation failure.
- Figure 2
Pseudarthrosis without bridging bone through the sacroiliac joint without instrumentation loosening.
- Figure 4
Numeric Pain Rating Scale scores; P < 0.001. Abbreviation: Preop, preoperative.
- Figure 5
Oswestry Disability Index scores; P < 0.001. Abbreviation: Preop, preoperative.
- Figure 6
Sacroiliac joint fusion with definitive bridging bone through the sacroiliac joint.
Tables
Demographic N = 13 Sacroiliac fusions, n 18 Bilateral 5 Age, y, mean (SD) 55.8 (35–78) Body mass index, mean (SD) 27.9 (21.7–36.7) Sex, n (%) Men 5 (38%) Women 8 (62%) Prior spine surgery, n/N (%) 7/13 (54%) Lumbar fusion, n/N (%) 6/7 (86%) Lumbar decompression, n/N (%) 1/7 (14%) Indication, n (%) N = 18 Pseudarthrosis without fixation failure 14 (77.8%) Fixation failure 3 (16.7%) Partial fusion 1 (5.6%) Grade Definition N (%) 1 Absent bridging bone/fusion mass 0 (0%) 2 Bone growth present without definitive bridging 1 (5.6%) 3 Definitive bridging bone across sacroiliac joint 1 (88.9%) NA - 1 (5.6%) Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; NA, not available.
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.