Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Other Publications
    • ijss

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • My alerts
International Journal of Spine Surgery

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Archive
  • About Us
    • About ISASS
    • About the Journal
    • Author Instructions
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewer Guidelines & Publication Criteria
  • More
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Join Us
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Sponsored Content
  • Follow ijss on Twitter
  • Visit ijss on Facebook
Research ArticleLumbar Spine

Recovery Trajectories After Lumbar Fusion Stratified by Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Disability Levels

Justin J. Turcotte, Jane C. Brennan, Andrea H. Johnson and Chad M. Patton
International Journal of Spine Surgery April 2025, 8755; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8755
Justin J. Turcotte
1 Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
PhD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jturcotte@luminishealth.org
Jane C. Brennan
1 Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea H. Johnson
1 Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
MSN, CRNP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chad M. Patton
1 Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Adjusted cumulative incidence curve depicting time to minimal clinically important difference achievements for all patients.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Adjusted cumulative incidence curve depicting time to minimal clinically important difference achievements stratified by baseline patient-reported outcomes measurement information system-physical function disability.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Baseline patient and operative characteristics by preoperative PROMIS-PF disability level.

    CharacteristicMild
    (n = 20)
    Moderate
    (n = 92)
    Severe
    (n = 32)
    P
    Demographics
     Age, y66.0 ± 8.764.7 ± 11.267.2 ± 11.00.515
     BMI29.6 ± 6.331.4 ± 5.531.1 ± 4.90.423
     Sex0.329
      Women16 (80.0)58 (63.0)20 (62.5)
      Men4 (20.0)34 (37.0)12 (37.5)
     Non-white race7 (35.0)a 10 (10.9)b 7 (21.9)a,b 0.021
     ASA ≥36 (30.3)52 (56.5)17 (53.1)0.098
     CCI score2.6 ± 1.82.5 ± 1.43.0 ± 1.80.293
    Prior spine surgery
     Laminectomy2 (10.0)23 (25.0)5 (15.6)0.233
     Fusion2 (10.0)10 (10.9)2 (6.2)0.749
    Procedure type
     PLF11 (55.0)44 (47.8)17 (53.1)0.779
     PLIF/TLIF9 (45.0)48 (52.2)15 (46.9)
    Primary diagnosis
     Pseudarthrosis/hardware failure0 (0)4 (4.3)0 (0)0.766*
     Degenerative disc disease5 (25.0)24 (26.1)8 (25.0)0.990
     Degenerative spondylolisthesis10 (50.0)58 (63.0)19 (59.4)0.552
     Spinal stenosis5 (25.0)a 6 (6.5)b 5 (15.6)a,b 0.035*
    Symptom type
     Axial only1 (5.0)8 (8.7)3 (9.4)
     Radicular only2 (10.0)8 (8.7)4 (12.5)0.943
     Axial and radicular17 (85.0)76 (82.6)25 (78.1)
    Symptom frequency
     Intermittent6 (30.0)14 (15.2)5 (15.6)0.274
     Constant14 (70.0)78 (84.8)27 (84.4)
    Change in symptoms
     No change/better13 (65.0)46 (50.0)11 (34.4)0.090
     Worse7 (35.0)46 (50.0)21 (65.6)
    Symptom duration
     ≤1 y5 (25.0)41 (44.6)17 (53.1)0.134
     >1 y15 (75.0)51 (55.4)15 (46.9)
    • Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; PLF, posterolateral fusion; PLIF/TLIF, posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; PROMIS-PF, patient-reported outcomes measurement information system-physical function.

    • Note: Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%). Statistically significant values at P < 0.05 are in boldface.

    • Subscripts denote post-hoc Bonferroni adjusted comparisons. Different letters denote significant differences between groups.

    • *Denotes Fisher's Exact test

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Patient-reported and clinical outcomes by preoperative PROMIS-PF disability level.

    VariableMild
    (n = 20)
    Moderate
    (n = 92)
    Severe
    (n = 32)
    P
    PROMIS-PF
     Baseline PF40.7 ± 7.1a 34.3 ± 2.8b 26.2 ± 3.7c <0.001
     Last (1 y) postoperative PF45.1 ± 7.3a 40.6 ± 7.9 a,b 38.4 ± 7.9b 0.011
     MCID
      Early5 (25.0)a 34 (37.0)a,b 19 (59.4)b 0.027
      Late4 (20.0)20 (21.7)3 (9.4)0.300
      Never11 (55.0)38 (41.3)10 (31.2)0.237
      Any MCID9 (45.0)54 (58.7)22 (68.8)0.237
      Days to MCID (achievers only)142.4 ± 70.0a 112.2 ± 76.4 a,b 72.8 ± 57.2 b 0.027
      Days to MCID (including censored non-achievers)248.3 ± 116.7a 194.1 ± 126.7 a,b 134.6 ± 119.0b 0.005
    Clinical outcome
     LOS hours47.8 ± 29.8 a,b 50.8 ± 27.9b 68.0 ± 37.7a 0.016
     LOS days1.7 ± 1.2 a,b 1.8 ± 1.2b 2.5 ± 1.6a 0.018
     SNF discharge0 (0)a,b 0 (0)b 3 (9.4)a 0.013*
     30-d ED return1 (5.0)10 (10.9)0 (0)0.122
     30-d readmission0 (0)4 (4.3)5 (15.6)0.051
     Repeat 1-y fusion3 (15.0)7 (7.6)2 (6.2)0.494
     Other 1-y reoperation1 (5.0)5 (5.4)3 (9.4)0.708
    • Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; LOS, length of stay; MCID, minimal clinically important difference; PROMIS-PF, patient-reported outcomes measurement information system-physical function; SNF, skilled nursing facility.

    • Note: Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%). Statistically significant values at P < 0.05 are in boldface.

    • Subscripts denote post-hoc Bonferroni-adjusted comparisons. Different letters denote significant differences between groups.

    • *Denote Fisher's Exact test

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Univariate Cox models: predictors of time to MCID achievement.

    PredictorHR95% CI P
    Demographics   
     Age0.990.97–1.010.169
     BMI1.000.96–1.040.987
     Sex1.220.78–1.900.375
     Non-white race0.670.36–1.270.223
     ASA ≥30.570.37–0.88 0.011
     CCI score0.850.73–0.98 0.025
    Prior spine surgery   
     Laminectomy1.020.61–1.720.941
     Fusion0.800.37–1.730.566
    Procedure type   
     PLF1.150.75–1.760.522
    Primary diagnosis   
     Pseudarthrosis/hardware failure0.690.17–2.800.603
     Degenerative disc disease1.040.63–1.720.885
     Degenerative spondylolisthesis0.980.63–1.520.911
     Spinal stenosis1.100.57–2.130.777
    Symptom type   
     Axial only1.280.62–2.660.506
     Radicular only0.860.40–1.870.706
     Axial and radicular0.950.54–1.660.862
    Symptom frequency   
     Constant0.630.37–1.060.081
    Change in symptoms   
     Worse1.100.72–1.690.657
    Symptom duration   
     >1 y0.940.61–1.440.772
    PROMIS-PF   
     Baseline PF0.950.92–0.98 0.005
     Baseline disability   
      Mild (40+)0.570.28–1.130.109
      Moderate (30–40)0.880.56–1.360.557
      Severe (<30)1.811.11–2.95 0.017
    • Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists Score; BMI, body mass index; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; MCID, minimal clinically important difference; PLF, posterolateral fusion.

    • Note: Statistically significant values at P < 0.05 are in boldface.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Multivariate linear and logistic regression: time to MCID and early MCID achievement.

    Predictorsβ/OR95% CI P
    Linear regression (β): days to MCID achievement (MCID achievers only)
     ASA ≥3−13.1−45.9 to 19.80.430
     CCI score9.5−2.6 to 21.60.122
     Severe disability−47.4−84.4 to –10.5 0.013
    Linear regression (β): days to MCID achievement (all patients)
     ASA ≥328.0−15.8 to 71.70.208
     CCI score14.80.56 to 29.0 0.042
     Severe disability−77.0−127.8 to −26.2 0.003
    Logistic regression (OR): early MCID achievement
     ASA ≥30.640.30–1.350.236
     CCI score0.760.59–0.98 0.038
     Severe disability2.951.23–7.04 0.015
    • Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists Score; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; MCID, minimal clinically important difference.

    • Note: P values < 0.05 in bold.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model: predictors of time to MCID.

    PredictorsHR95% CI P
    Demographics   
     ASA ≥30.550.34–0.91 0.018
     CCI score0.880.75–1.030.118
    PROMIS-PF baseline disability   
     Moderate (30–40) vs mild1.900.86–4.220.113
     Severe (<30)   
      vs mild3.521.48–8.42 0.005
      vs moderate1.851.10–3.12 0.020
    • Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists Score; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; MCID, minimal clinically important difference.

    • Note: P values < 0.05 in bold.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

International Journal of Spine Surgery: 19 (S2)
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Vol. 19, Issue S2
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on International Journal of Spine Surgery.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recovery Trajectories After Lumbar Fusion Stratified by Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Disability Levels
(Your Name) has sent you a message from International Journal of Spine Surgery
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the International Journal of Spine Surgery web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Recovery Trajectories After Lumbar Fusion Stratified by Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Disability Levels
Justin J. Turcotte, Jane C. Brennan, Andrea H. Johnson, Chad M. Patton
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2025, 8755; DOI: 10.14444/8755

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Recovery Trajectories After Lumbar Fusion Stratified by Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Disability Levels
Justin J. Turcotte, Jane C. Brennan, Andrea H. Johnson, Chad M. Patton
International Journal of Spine Surgery Apr 2025, 8755; DOI: 10.14444/8755
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Safety and Viability of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Complex Revision Lumbar Spine Surgeries: Insights From a Case Series of 135 Patients on Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion/Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Removal
  • Effects of Body Mass Index on Spondylolisthesis Surgery and Associated Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Retrospective Review
Show more Lumbar Spine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • lumbar fusion
  • minimal clinically important difference
  • MCID
  • PROMIS
  • patient reported outcomes

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Content
  • Archive

More Information

  • About IJSS
  • About ISASS
  • Privacy Policy

More

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Feedback

Other Services

  • Author Instructions
  • Join ISASS
  • Reprints & Permissions

© 2025 International Journal of Spine Surgery

International Journal of Spine Surgery Online ISSN: 2211-4599

Powered by HighWire